Ready to clean up your CRM workflow?
Book a CRM Workflow Audit and see where leads, follow-ups, reporting, or disconnected tools can be fixed first.
Hexagon reviews the applications, APIs, exports, imports, webhooks, files, spreadsheets, and manual handoffs behind an important workflow. The review identifies where information fails, duplicates, arrives late, loses context, or lacks monitoring—and recommends which integration problem should be addressed first.
Integration-Specific
Focused on system handoffs, data movement, errors, and ownership.
Workflow Context
Review the business process—not only endpoint availability.
Priority Roadmap
Identify quick fixes, dependencies, and the right integration path.
No Forced Rebuild
Recommend configuration, repair, integration, API development, or further discovery based on evidence.
The same customer, order, project, invoice, service, or status data is entered in several systems.
Teams depend on exports, imports, email, spreadsheets, or manual reconciliation.
Existing integrations fail silently or produce duplicates and mismatched status.
A new platform must connect with CRM, ERP, accounting, scheduling, payments, support, eCommerce, or custom software.
Leadership needs to decide between native connectors, direct APIs, middleware, custom APIs, automation, or a larger integration layer.
Vendor APIs, credentials, limits, data ownership, or system-of-record decisions are unclear.
The primary issue is CRM stages, follow-up, reporting, or CRM adoption.
The requirement is already approved and ready for implementation.
A penetration test, formal security audit, complete source-code review, or vendor certification is required.
1
Form submission · Order · Status change · New account · Payment · File upload · Scheduled job · User action
2
Record owner · Required data · Validation · identity · permissions · event or export
3
Native connector · API · Webhook · Middleware · Queue · Secure file · Approved database interface · Manual handoff
4
Mapping · business rules · create or update behavior · duplicate handling · response
5
User confirmation · logs · alerts · retries · exception ownership · reconciliation · support
6
Deploy by portfolio, team, region, or customer; train users; monitor issues; verify operations; and plan improvements."
Confirm the business event, systems, records, users, current method, symptoms, and desired result.
Examine system ownership, API or connector access, data mapping, timing, authentication, errors, duplicates, reconciliation, monitoring, and vendor dependencies.
Separate configuration, data, API, workflow, vendor, monitoring, technical-debt, and architecture issues.
The recommendation may be a native connector, existing integration repair, direct API integration, middleware or integration layer, custom API development, automation, or paid discovery.
The main systems, record movement, current connection method, and visible failure points.
Configure
Repair
Direct API
Integration Layer
Custom API
Automation
Investigate Further
Whether the business needs a technical discovery
API implementation scope
system-integration architecture
API development
Vendor discussion
no immediate project
The initial review is not a complete integration specification
source-code audit
security test
performance test
data migration plan
fixed implementation estimate
Use when existing APIs or connectors can support the approved system-to-system workflow.
Use when the requirement spans several enterprise systems, shared data, departments, legacy applications, and operational processes.
Use when a new reusable API or secure interface must be designed and developed for an application or platform.
These activities can be scoped separately after the review.
It is a focused diagnostic of the workflow, systems, records, connection methods, API readiness, mappings, timing, failures, monitoring, and ownership behind one or more important system handoffs.
Yes. The review can examine the business workflow, mappings, authentication, timing, logs, errors, retries, duplicates, reconciliation, monitoring, vendor changes, and operational ownership visible within the agreed scope.
Not necessarily. The review can begin with workflow descriptions, documentation, screenshots, logs, sample records, and vendor information. Any system access is handled separately through an approved process.
Daks leads business discovery and solution planning for CRM, custom software, integrations, automation, and digital-transformation projects.
Certified and trusted across leading cloud, CRM, security, and enterprise technology ecosystems.
Share the applications, record, current connection, failure symptoms, vendor constraints, and decision you need to make. Hexagon will review the visible gaps and recommend the most practical next integration path.
Free CRM workflow audit
We’ll review your CRM, follow-up process, integrations, and reporting gaps — then show the fastest fixes to convert more leads without adding more tools.
300+
Software projects delivered
37+
Enterprise apps built
150+
delivery team members
10+
countries served
Prefer to schedule first? Book directly on Calendly →
Tell Us About Your Project
No sales pressure. We'll review your answers and come back with a clear recommendation within 1 business day.
CRM-first software development, integrations, ERP workflows, APIs, and custom applications for growing teams.
© 2026 Hexagon IT Solutions. All rights reserved.
What is an API Integration Gap Review?